Urban Waterfront Manifesto
© 1999 The
Waterfront Center. This document may not be reproduced without express
permission from The Waterfront Center.
Dear colleagues:
To promote sensitive, site-specific urban waterfront planning and development
that reflects the individuality of each place, we, together with associates,
have developed a set of principles to suggest to communities. When done right,
we're saying, waterfront redevelopment projects can be exciting and
transforming.
We issue our statement to counter the unfortunate tendency by some in the design
and development fields given to what we term formula approaches — copying
something that has worked in one place and transferring it elsewhere, or
building projects unsympathetic to their unique waterfront setting. There are
also cases of over-building and excessive privatization along urban waterfronts
today.
The Urban Waterfront Manifesto has been endorsed
already by a number of our associates. If
you want to add your name to the list, please let us know.
Urban Waterfront Manifesto
Water is a defining force that fundamentally shapes the character of each place
it touches. The role of water in transport, industry, sanitation and nourishment
made it the raison d'ętre of human settlement. It is a feature to be honored
and celebrated — not to be treated merely as cosmetic or as just a commodity.
Waterfronts, the unique places where land and water meet, are a finite resource
embodying the special history and character of each community. Urban
waterfronts, like the cities they help define, are dynamic places. The last
three decades have witnessed profound changes along abandoned or underused
waterfronts. The trend is accelerating in cities around the globe. It applies to
canals, lakes and rivers as well as coasts.
With this growing popularity comes a tendency by some to look for the quick
solution, to adopt a formula that may have worked somewhere else. In the 1980's
it was the "festival marketplace" fad. In the 1990's, it is the
"urban entertainment district" and/or stadiums. In a time of pervading
sameness and homogenization worldwide this is particularly dismaying because
waterfronts above all factors give each community a chance to express its
individuality and help distinguish it from others.
We, the undersigned, urge careful consideration of the following principles.
They are offered in the spirit of encouraging communities to aim for
distinctiveness as they undertake the challenge of converting or conserving
their waterfront resources.
It is essential to keep in mind the inherent public interest in waterfronts, reflected in public ownership of water itself.
Planning
Waterfront planning should be long-range, comprehensive and holistic and
should encompass all relevant disciplines. It should use all appropriate
technologies and encourage a system of sustainable growth and operation.
Meaningful community involvement is integral to valid waterfront planning and development. It should begin early and be continuous.
Waterfront work is not just about economic development, is not simply a design question or only about environmental issues. Rather it is a fusion of these and related disciplines that should be sought.
We encourage communities to think long-term in waterfront work. Many conversions take 10, 15 or 25 years. The understandable desire to achieve instant results should be resisted in all except the smallest steps. Development over time allows a richness of character vs. the sameness of a one-time "Big Bang" approach.
It should be remembered that every waterfront is an integral part of a watershed consisting of creeks, rivers, estuaries or bays.
Development
The best undertakings involve a partnership between the dynamism of the private sector, the stewardship of public entities and the energy of citizens.
Public access to and along the urban waterfront should be the hallmark of all projects, including residential developments. This means physical and psychologically welcoming access. Visual access to the water likewise should be a pervading objective.
It is vital that communities distinguish between learning from good examples of waterfront planning and development elsewhere and blindly copying them. Waterfront concepts and projects should flow from the nature of each place and embody its essential spirit.
Where possible, a diversity of uses wants to be included along waterfronts, from passive parks to vibrant commercial attractions. People of all income levels and cultures should feel welcome. Nighttime activities as well as daytime can be provided. Distinctive places for children as well as the elderly should be included.
Waterfronts present unparalleled opportunities for interpretation and education — of natural values, community history and culture, including notably the industrial and transportation activities that often preceded today's developments. Preserving and interpreting the tangible aspects of the history of a place provides character and meaning to waterfront development.
The tendency to clean up waterfronts should be approached carefully so that rich underlying values are not unnecessarily sacrificed. Preferences for uses that require access to water is important, even if they are somewhat unsightly.
Public art installations should be encouraged and the active participation
of each city's arts community sought from the outset of waterfront planning,
to ensure that artists' special way of seeing things is incorporated.
Prepared July 10, 1999
Cape May, New Jersey, USA
Signatories:
·
Ed Astone,
Town Manager,
·
Crystal Barriscale, Beyer Blinder Belle,
·
David Benn,
Cho Wilks and Benn,
·
Geraldine
M. Bolanowski, Councilwoman,
·
Ken Boshcoff, Mayor of
·
Ronald R.
Bourne, Bourne Consulting Engineering,
·
Jim Bowen,
·
Ann Breen,
The
·
Peter
Brink, National Trust for Historic Preservation,
·
Ann Buttenwieser,
·
Deborah
Carey, Friends of the Fort
Point Channel,
·
Kenneth W.
Carruth, Township of
·
Erik
Carson, Executive Dept., State Planning Office,
·
Kenneth M.
Cobb, JJR Incorporated,
·
Rodney A.
Cobi, Ctr. for Landscape Interpretation, Port
·
Arthur
Collins Sr., Collins Enterprises, Old
·
Marianne
Connolly, MA, Water Resources Authority,
·
Douglas Coolman, EDSA,
·
Stuart
Dawson, Sasaki Associates, Inc.,
·
Steve Durrant, Alta Planning
and Design,
·
Tony
Edwards, EDCO Design Ltd.
·
Jan Eversen,
Glenn & Sadler Engineers and Architects,
·
R. Allen
Eskew, Eskew+,
·
Nicholas
Falk, Urban and Economic Development Group,
·
Karen Fiene,
Karen Fiene Architects ,
·
David
Fisher, British Waterways, Watford
·
Jennifer
Fleming, Pensacola Com. Redev. Agency,
·
Ed Freer,
JJR Incorporated,
·
Raymond Gastil, Van Alen Institute,
·
H. Linwood
Gilbert, Urban Economics Inc.,
·
Rick
Gonzalez, REG Arcitects,
·
James
Guerra, James Guerra Architects,
·
Karl T.
Haglund, New
·
Stephen Hallquist,
·
Bonnie A.
Harken, Harken Architects & H.L.W. Strategies, NY
·
Barry Hersh,
·
Erik Hess,
City of
·
Nick Hollo,
Keys Young, Milsons Point, NSW,
·
Alan Horwitz, The Hillier Group,
·
Grant
Jones, Jones & Jones,
·
Barbara
Kauffman, Regional Business Authority,
·
Michael W.
Keller,
·
Kevin Kilduff,
·
L. Michael
Krieger Esq., Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (retired),
·
Douglas Lemle, Lemle Associates Inc.,
·
Mark
London,
·
Jeanne Lukenda, Carol R. Johnson Associates,
·
Patty Lundeen, WETDesign,
·
Larry T.
Manuel,
·
Ian McAskile, Maglin Furniture Systems Ltd.,
·
Prof. Dorn
McGrath,
·
Patricia
Merrell, Chickasaw Bluffs Conservancy,
·
·
Joe
Moseley, Shiner Moseley and Associates Inc., Corpus Christ, TX
·
Mary Ellen
Murphy,
·
Bill Neyenhouse, NJDEP, Coastal Plan & Prog.,
·
Beth
Nicholson, Save the Harbor/Save the Bay,
·
Carole
Nixon,
·
Charles
Norris, Norris and Norris Associates,
·
Thomas M.
Norton, New York State Canal Corp.,
·
Anne Olson,
·
Chris Oshikata,
·
Slobodon
Dan Paich, The Artship Foundation,
·
William C.
Payne,
·
Janice Penner, The Forks North Portage Partnership,
·
Melvin
Ramos,
·
John
Randolph, Schuylkill Development Council,
·
Dick Rigby,
The
·
Fabian
Rivera, Keyspan Energy,
·
Thomas H.
Robertson,
·
Monty
Robson,
·
Harriet B.
Saperstein, Consultant,
·
Joseph Schachter, Concrete Flotation Systems, Inc. (retired),
·
Capt. Bill
Sheehan, Hackensack Riverkeeper Inc.,
·
John R.
Sherwood, The Sherwood Consultancy,
·
Carol Sondheimer, Dept. of Economic Development,
·
Scott J.
Spota, J.C. MacElroy Company, Inc.,
·
Michael L.
Stark, President, Shawnee Run Greenway, Inc,
·
Robin
Stein,
·
David
Stones, The Forks North Portage Partnership,
·
Greg Swanzey, The Schooner Ernestina Com.,
·
Prof.
Athena Tacha,
·
Gail
Thomas, The Dallas Institute,
·
Sandra Threlfall, Waterfront Coalition,
·
Aaron J.
Tuley, Ctr. for Landscape Interpretation, Port
·
Fred Were,
Waterfront Dev. Corp., Ltd,
·
Rick Wiederhorn,
·
Paul Willen,
·
Marilyn
Williams, The Forks North Portage Partnership,
·
Helen
Wilson, Conservation Heritage Design,
·
Kathy Wine,
River Action, Inc.,
·
Colin
·
Arthur
Ziegler Jr.,
·
Susan Zusy,
RTKL Associates Inc.,
Want to add your name to the growing number? E-mail us at mail@waterfrontcenter.org.
e-mail:
mail@waterfrontcenter.org ©
2007 The Waterfront Center
Content and photographs on this site may not be reproduced without express
permission from The Waterfront Center.